The aim of this study was to determine whether a caries infiltrant resin material is capable of penetrating MIH-affected enamel. Ethical approval was obtained to collect extracted teeth (from private and public paediatric specialist practices), which were

then placed in 4% neutral buffered formaldehyde for at least 2 weeks, rinsed, and stored at 4°C and 100% humidity until use. Both MIH affected (n = 17) and sound (n = 3) teeth were collected. MIH lesion types (white/cream or yellow/brown) were divided as equally as possible into three groups (n = 7 per group) and the Icon® Caries infiltrant (smooth surfaces) clinical kit (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) used to apply HCl etch, ethanol, and infiltrant resin according to manufacturer instructions (standard group) [12], or with an additional step of 2 min

0.95% w/v NaOCl irrigation followed by 2 min water rinsing prior to or following etching (pre-treatment selleck chemicals llc group and mid-treatment check details group, respectively). Lesions were sectioned 24 + hrs post-curing using a water cooled diamond embedded circular saw (Minitom, Struers, Denmark) and polished with successively finer grade silicon carbide paper (600–4000 grit). Sections were examined under a light microscope (Leica L2, Wetzlar, Germany) before undergoing Vickers microhardness testing (MHT-10, Anton Paar, Austria) while hydrated (F = 0.5 N, t = 5 s). Data were obtained from captured microscope images using appropriate standards and image analysis software

(ImageJ, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and entered into Excel (Microsoft Corp, Washington, USA) software for analysis. Due to the inherent variability of hardness in MIH lesions, change in hardness was determined by comparing values of infiltrated and non-infiltrated enamel as closely adjacent as possible. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA and t-tests with the critical level for significance set at P < 0.05 were undertaken using the same software. Additional sections were gold sputter coated and surfaces examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 10 kV (FEI Quanta SEM). Light microscopic examination showed significant, but erratic, infiltrant resin penetration of MIH enamel for most lesions (Fig. 1); however, however two lesions were found to be confined to the inner half of enamel, and so, no apparent infiltration had occurred. There was no statistically significant difference between either lesion type or infiltration protocols in terms of absolute or percentage depth or percentage area of penetration (Table 1). Vickers microhardness increased, relative to the immediately adjacent hypomineralised enamel, in areas where visible infiltrant penetration had occurred: 3.0 ± 1.8 GPa v 1.8 ± 1.2 GPa (control 4.4 ± 1.0 GPa). The mid-treatment NaOCl group demonstrated the greatest changes in hardness; but, this was due to one outlying sample where a 12-fold, corresponding to a 2.