Six days post-infection, 3 × 106L. major promastigotes were inoculated into the same footpad (Figure 1a). We chose this point in time for co-infection because transient S. ratti-specific
Th2 response had fully developed by day 6 p.i and remained at maximal levels through days 6–9, as we have shown recently by kinetic studies (10). During this period, mesLN cells responded to antigen-specific stimulation by S. ratti lysate but also to polyclonal stimulation by CD3 engagement with maximal production of Th2-associated cytokines IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 and IL-13. Likewise, the numbers of adult S. ratti in the gut and the larval output in the faeces were maximal at days 6–9. To compare the formation of a protective memory response, mice were re-infected once they had resolved the first selleck compound L. major infection. Comparison of the general course of Leishmania learn more infection as estimated by footpad swelling in L. major singly and L. major/S. ratti
co-infected mice revealed no difference in first and second L. major infection (Figure 1b). Direct analysis of parasite burden in the infected footpads by quantification of Leishmania DNA at days 10 and 31 p.i. also showed a comparable infection course in singly and co-infected mice thus confirming that footpad swelling indeed reflected the degree of L. major infection in our system (Figure 1c). These results suggest that efficient host defence and establishment of protective immunological memory were not suppressed by a pre-existing nematode infection.
To rule out that the artificially high dose of 3 × 106 promastigote L. major that is usually employed for laboratory infections would mask subtle effects induced by the pre-existing nematode infection, we repeated the experiment with a lower dose of promastigote L. major (3 × 103). Again the footpad swelling was not changed in co-infected mice, and establishment of protective memory to a subsequent high-dose infection was readily achieved in both groups (Figure 1d). Also, the L. major infection of mice at day 7 of a secondary S. ratti infection did not lead to increased footpad swelling in comparison with S. ratti single infected mice (data not shown). Taken together, we observed no impact of a pre-existing S. ratti infection, primary or Reverse transcriptase secondary, on the course of high and low dose as well as first and second L. major infections. Next, we investigated the nature of immune responses induced against subsequent infections with S. ratti and L. major– two parasites that are controlled by either Th2 or Th1 responses, respectively. To measure S. ratti-specific cytokine production and proliferation, we isolated mesLN cells at day 8 post-S. ratti infection and performed in vitro cultures in the presence of anti-CD3 and S. ratti antigen (Figure 2a). We chose the mesLN as lymphatic organ for analysis as they drain the small intestine where the parasitic adults reside. Day 8 p.i.