Although the effects of estrogen are presumed to be mediated by the classical estrogen receptors, ERα and ERβ, recent studies have pointed to the newly described G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPR30/GPER as contributing to many of these responses. We and others have recently shown
that, PCI-32765 mw like estradiol (E2), the GPER-selective agonist G-1 can attenuate EAE.38,39 In the current work we show that G-1 can evoke IL-10 expression and secretion from CD4+ T cells differentiated under Th17-polarizing conditions. G-1-mediated IL-10 expression was blocked by the GPER-directed antagonist G15,40 and was dependent on extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signalling,
consistent with known mechanisms of IL-10 production within effector T-cell populations.12 Analysis of IL-17A, Foxp3 and RORγt expression demonstrated that these responses occurred in cells expressing both IL-17A click here and RORγt, as well as in a population of Foxp3+ RORγt+ hybrid T cells. Taken together, our results demonstrate a novel immunomodulatory property for G-1. In addition, these data suggest that the family of GPER-directed small molecules may serve as model compounds for a new class of T-cell-targeted pharmaceuticals in the treatment of autoimmune disease and cancer. Male (7–11 weeks old) C57BL/6 and Foxp3egfp mice were used for this study. Mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and subsequently housed, bred and cared for according to the institutional guidelines in the Animal Resource Facility
at the University Sinomenine of New Mexico. Foxp3-IRES-GFP (Foxp3egfp) transgenic mice, which contain egfp under the control of an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) inserted downstream of the foxp3 coding region, have been previously described.41 T cells were obtained from single cell suspensions following homogenization of spleens and lymph nodes by mechanical disruption and passage through a 70-μm nylon filter. Suspensions were stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD62 ligand (CD62L) and anti-CD44 antibodies (Biolegend, San Diego, CA). Enriched populations of CD4+ CD62Lhi and CD4+ CD44lo CD62Lhi naive T cells were collected by flow cytometric cell sorting on a MoFlo cell sorter (Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA). Purity was regularly > 96%. In most cases, experiments were repeated with both types of sorted naive T cells, and no differences were noted. Alternatively, CD4+ cells were collected from the single cell suspensions by magnetic bead sorting, using CD4 microbeads (Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and positive selection on an AutoMACS (Miltenyi). This yielded populations with a purity > 90%.