9578 and 0.9972, respectively). Increases of cells arrested in G(1) cycle phase were observed with increasing concentrations of oleuropein and were negatively associated in a very significant linear correlation with levels of ROS and MDA, respectively (r(2) = 0.9904 and 0.9702, respectively). The results further suggest the therapeutic effects of oleuropein on a variety of cancer cells.”
“We conducted this study to evaluate accuracy, time saving, radiation doses, safety, Selleck Sapitinib and pain relief of ultrasound (US)-guided periradicular injections
versus computed tomography (CT)-controlled interventions in the cervical spine in a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Forty adult patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned to either a US or a CT group. US-guided periradicular injections were performed on a standard ultrasound device using a broadband linear array transducer. By basically following the osseous landmarks for level definition in “”in-plane techniques”", a spinal needle was advanced as near as possible to the intended, US-depicted nerve root. The respective needle tip positioning was then verified by CT. The control group underwent CT-guided injections, which were performed under standardized
procedures using the CT-positioning laser function.
The accuracy of US-guided interventions was 100 %. The mean time to final needle placement in the US group was 02:21 +/- A 01:43 min:s versus 10:33 selleck chemicals llc +/- A 02:30 min:s in the CT group. The mean dose-length product radiation dose, including CT confirmation for study
purposes only, was Adriamycin DNA Damage inhibitor 25.1 +/- A 16.8 mGy cm for the US group and 132.5 +/- A 78.4 mGy cm for the CT group. Both groups showed the same significant visual analog scale decay (p < 0.05) without “”inter-methodic”" differences of pain relief (p > 0.05).
US-guided periradicular injections are accurate, result in a significant reduction of procedure expenditure under the avoidance of radiation and show the same therapeutic effect as CT-guided periradicular injections.”
“Background: Deep infection following shoulder surgery is a rare but devastating problem. The use of an effective skin-preparation solution may be an important step in preventing infection. The purposes of the present study were to examine the native bacteria around the shoulder and to determine the efficacy of three different surgical skin-preparation solutions on the eradication of bacteria from the shoulder.
Methods: A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate 150 consecutive patients undergoing shoulder surgery at one institution. Each shoulder was prepared with one of three randomly selected solutions: ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol), DuraPrep (0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol), or povidone-iodine scrub and paint (0.75% iodine scrub and 1.0% iodine paint).