She was treated accordingly, her condition improved, and she was discharged home. During the next 2 months, the patient returned to the emergency department 2 more times and was hospitalized each time with the same diagnosis. During her third admission, it was discovered that the patient’s primary care physician had restarted her HCTZ for hypertension after it had been discontinued during each of the first two hospitalizations. The patient’s symptoms began within hours of the first and second hospitalizations and almost immediately after taking a dose of HCTZ on the day of the third hospitalization. Her medical history revealed documented allergic reactions
to sulfonamide drugs and penicillin; thus a hypersensitivity reaction to HCTZ was suspected. Dorsomorphin inhibitor Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated a probable relationship between the patient’s hypersensitivity reactions and HCTZ therapy Because of a lack of evidence showing cross-reactivity see more among the different classes of sulfonamides, the mechanism of the allergic reaction to HCTZ was
unlikely to be cross-sensitivity between sulfonamide antibiotics and sulfonamide nonantibiotic drugs. Although the mechanism is not clear, evidence shows that the allergy to the HCTZ (sulfonamide nonantibiotic) may be due to a predisposition to drug allergies rather than sulfonamide cross-sensitivity. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for these types of allergic reactions.”
“BACKGROUND: The incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis is not well characterized among patients taking statin-fibrate combination therapies.\n\nOBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the rates of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis during periods of exposure to different statins and fibrates.\n\nMETHODS:
We retrospectively identified a cohort of patients who initiated a statin or fibrate between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2007, using a database of a large US health insurer. Patients were followed for the occurrence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis, determined by clinical review of medical records. Exposure status during the study period was determined selleck compound by electronic records of statin and fibrate dispensing. Incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for various combinations of fibrate and statin exposure were modeled, using Poisson regression.\n\nRESULTS: There were 1,116,805 patients who initiated statin and/or fibrate therapy, with 2.4 million person-years of observation. Seventy cases of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis were confirmed. Adjusted analyses showed a persistent increased risk of rhabdomyolysis with combination therapy, while statin and fibrate therapy alone showed similar, nonsignificant increases in risk. The adjusted IRA for a statin and fenofibrate was 3.26 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.80), while the adjusted IRA for a statin and gemfibrozil was 11.93 (95% CI 3.96 to 35.93) versus statin therapy alone.