019) and the total hospitalization time (P = 0.043), but could not reduce the time to the tapering of corticosteroid (P = 0.96). In SJS patients, the times of arrested progression and hospitalization were also reduced

significantly (P = 0.019 and P = 0.0475, respectively). Likewise, the time to the tapering of corticosteroid was not reduced (P = 0.122).\n\nConclusion\n\nCombination therapy with corticosteroid and IVIG exhibited a tendency to reduce the mortality rate in comparison with the solo administration of corticosteroid. The decrease in the mortality rate, however, was not statistically significant. Combination therapy also arrested progression earlier Adriamycin and decreased the hospitalization time, meaning that the total dose of corticosteroid may be reduced.

Combination therapy, however, did not lead to earlier tapering of corticosteroid. No severe adverse effects of IVIG were found during treatment.”
“The potential risk of HIV-1 infection following human bite although epidemiologically insignificant, but it is biologically possible. There are anecdotal reports of HIV transmission by human bites particularly if saliva is mixed with blood. The oral tissues support HIV replication and may serve as a previously unrecognized HIV reservoir. The HIV infected individuals have more viruses in blood than saliva, possibly due to the potent HIV-inhibitory properties find more of saliva. The case presented here is of a primary HIV infections following a human bite where in the saliva was not blood check details stained but it got smeared on a raw nail bed of a recipient. The blood and saliva of the source and blood of the recipient showed a detectable viral load with 91% sequence homology of C2-V3 region of HIV gp120 between the two individuals. The recipient did not receive PEP [post exposure prophylaxis] as his family physician was unaware of salivary transmission. The family physician should have taken PEP decision after proper evaluation of the severe and bleeding bite. Hence it is necessary to treat the

HIV infected human bites with post exposure prophylaxis.”
“Purpose\n\nTo compare men and women faculty’s family situations and perceptions of organizational climate.\n\nMethod\n\nIn 2005, the authors sent an electronic survey to full-time faculty at the University of Minnesota Medical School to assess their perceptions of professional relationships, mentoring, obstacles to satisfaction, policies, circumstances that contribute to departure, gender equality, family situations, and work life.\n\nResults\n\nOf 615 faculty, 354 (57%) responded. Women and men were equally productive and worked similar total hours. Women were less likely to have partners/spouses, were more likely to have partners/spouses who were employed, and devoted more time to household tasks. Compared with men, women reported more experience with obstacles to career success and satisfaction and with circumstances that contribute to departure.